[WIP] Store downloads in timescale #3560
Conversation
|
Is there an issue I could look at? |
segiddins
force-pushed
the
segiddins/store-downloads-in-timescale
branch
from
10de755
to
6862f5c
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3560 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.74% 98.72% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 199 204 +5
Lines 4953 5023 +70
==========================================
+ Hits 4891 4959 +68
- Misses 62 64 +2
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
segiddins
force-pushed
the
segiddins/store-downloads-in-timescale
branch
from
fcd2c14
to
6ee76d4
Compare
|
Is there any progress on this PR? I run Developer Advocacy at Timescale, and I'd love to help out anywhere I can! We ❤️ Ruby, and we ❤️ what RubyGems does for the ecosystem. Looking at the RFC drawbacks section there are several things I can assist with off the bat:
|
|
@jamessewell I've had severely reduced hours to work on RubyGems things the past few months, and most of my time has been dedicated to more security-related work (mainly the OIDC stuff), as well as stability work. I'd like to pick this back up once I have full-time hours again to devote to RubyGems work. |
|
Hey folks, I see that we'll have a hackathon day and I'd love to work on this one as I'm already a few years on the Timescaledb side and with RubyGems support, I think we could easily move it into a reviewable state. |
|
Hello @jonatas, currently this was put on hold. I'm available to hop on call and discuss current setup and possibilities. I would prefer smaller incremental contribution over one huge PR if possible. I'm happy to help. Feel free to ping me here or at bundler Slack. |
|
Closing this for now as there is other separate work on timescale. Re-open if needed. |
Depends on crunchloop/timescaledb-rails#58
RFC: rubygems/rfcs#48